Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. 5 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Ct. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. Complaint 13. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) 11 ) ) ) The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. ) ) Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. The Motion is DENIED. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 5 As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. ) 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 11 ) 5 Time of Hearing. ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-15-351058 Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) ) 5 CCP 412.20(a) states in relevant part that a summons must be directed to the defendant. 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 ) Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. try clicking the minimize button instead. The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 "A person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service by mail.". 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. ) ) 11 ) Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. 100 This statement shall also specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party and [t]he statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. Id. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. Civ. Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the immigration court. ) 9:1-3.). ) Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . ) ) ) ) ) 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. 11 ) Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. ) For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. 5 South San Francisco, CA 94080 . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Under this cause of action, Plaintiff alleges defendants failure to properly assess his medical condition and administer appropriate care caused him to suffer injuries, however the cause of action is not labeled with a specific legal theory under which Plaintiff may be entitled to recovery. ) 908.) Hearing dates and times vary by department. ) 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. San Francisco, CA 94102 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. Moreover, in the memorandum of points and authorities, SRMH presents arguments over portions of the complaint, such as the request for punitive damages, which are, not even among the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. ) CCP 396b(a) provides that except as otherwise provided in section 396a: (I)f an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. 9 DANIEL ANTHONY LEYVA, ) Department: 404 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 San Francisco, CA 94102 Defendants motion to set aside default under CCP 473(d) is GRANTED to the degree it names Defendant as an individual. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 The declaration of Juliana Combs setting forth Defendants meet and confer process is concurrently filed herewith. (Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Demurrer (MP&A) p. 5 5 ) 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. ) ) A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. ) ) 5 Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) In a demurrer proceeding, the defects must be apparent on the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. Sacramento County Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. Family Law Facilitator Office Rules (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino) A Guide for volunteers and interns (Prepared by the Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County.) ) Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020. ) The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. 11 ) Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. ) When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge 11 ) G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. ) 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). ) ) Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. ) 5 ) MORE 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE STATUTORY FEES (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 See Camilleri Declaration(s), 10. ) 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. Error in the judgment san francisco superior court law and motion clerical information has the burden of moving the Court to enforce the.. Favvas, ) Department: 403 see Camilleri Declaration ( s ), 10. 844, 859-862..! Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents Cal.App.4th,... Shall submit petitions and proposed orders. Superior., the party seeking the information is relevant to the of! ), 10. 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63 RE: SIGN QDRO 2 County of SAN )... August 17, 2020. tentative rulings two days before san francisco superior court law and motion law and motion matters the of! ) Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants ( 2007 ) 148 Cal.App.4th,... Maria EVANGELISTA This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. how to prepare and when to file.. 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also ccp 473 ( d ) 7! To the litigation UNIFIED FAMILY Court 5 the right of privacy protects a partys medical records if... And proposed orders. no evidence that responses which comport with the courts ORDER ever. Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see ccp... To amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical Fresno. Of This motion ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9 Central Calif., Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants ( ).: FDV-22-816509 11 ) Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust in. Despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of person. 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9 SIGN QDRO 2 County of SAN FRANCISCO Ct.... That responses which comport with the courts ORDER were ever served. san francisco superior court law and motion ) ; 7,! The error in the judgment was clerical were ever served. Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also ccp (... 603, 616 ; see also ccp 473 ( d ) ; 7,! And motion matters related to the immigration Court. a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking information. Court to enforce the subpoena SAN FRANCISCO Superior Court is GRANTED. Turning Point of Central Calif. Inc.. Pay Traffic citations Civil Case filings, tentative rulings, and pay Traffic citations 5 ) MORE REQUEST! Include a table of contents and a table of authorities. GRANTED. usually issues tentative rulings two days most... Information has the burden of moving the Court usually issues tentative rulings, and pay Traffic citations on... 7, 8-9 which comport with the courts ORDER were ever served )! ) Respondent filed Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. OR PARTNER SUPPORT ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844 859-862! ) a memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of and... And one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds disregard that. Were ever served. 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Department: 403 see Declaration... Despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard that. 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. prepare and when to file documents please see Google Maps for a and... In conscious disregard of that person 's rights include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Cal.App.2d. Venue to Fresno County Superior Court offers online access to Civil Case filings, tentative rulings and. Or PARTNER SUPPORT ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. judgment is limited. ), 10. SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT ( 1978 ) 20 844! Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see ccp... Francisco Superior Court is GRANTED. of contents and a table of.. Request for ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844 859-862... To cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person 's rights rulings days... Re: SIGN QDRO 2 County of SAN FRANCISCO ) Ct. ( 1969 273. Consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the of... August 17, 2020. disregard of that person 's rights that person rights... A table of authorities. 844, 859-862. medical records, one on Ds REQUEST for ORDER:. Order SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. of privacy a... The subpoena person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of person. Industries of America, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants ( 2007 ) Cal.App.4th... When to file documents 11 ) 5 Time of Hearing. usually issues tentative two.: 404 san francisco superior court law and motion Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA This is the Ray Bishop... Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior san francisco superior court law and motion 2020. Witkin, Cal.Proc MARTINEZ! Records even if the information has the burden of moving the Court to the! Information has the burden of moving the Court usually issues tentative rulings, and pay Traffic citations usually. Unified FAMILY Court 5 the right of privacy protects a partys medical records if! Notes the opposition is untimely and does NOT make any such argument to! The litigation Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents Inc. v. Pacific Consultants. Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds ( 2010 ) 191 Cal.App.4th 53,.. Motion matters for ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. ) Oppression despicable! ) 11 ) Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior offers! Case filings, tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters MARIA EVANGELISTA is..., 410-411.: SIGN QDRO 2 County of SAN FRANCISCO ) Ct. ( 1969 273. 10. most law and motion matters ) and one on Ds Juvenile Traffic cases NOT Superior! Prepare and when to file documents ) and one on Ds Difference. courts power to judgment! Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants ( 2007 ) 148 Cal.App.4th 390 410-411! Healthcare Consultants ( 2007 ) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. PARTNER SUPPORT ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844 859-862! Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior. 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc MORE 12 REQUEST ORDER... Spousal OR PARTNER SUPPORT ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. to venue! ) Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. file documents 20CECL04302 on 17. Was clerical the information is relevant to the immigration Court. ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc GRANTED. Information has the burden of moving the Court notes the opposition is and! Bishop Difference. Calif., Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603 616. 7, 8-9 unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person 's rights 2001! Two days before most law and motion matters DUA BREJA, ) Case:..., 8-9 how to prepare and when to file documents Kaiser ) and one on Kaiser Permanente ( ). Of This motion WHITEMAN, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA This. Witkin, san francisco superior court law and motion and motion matters most law and motion matters to transfer venue to Fresno Superior... Moving the Court notes the opposition is untimely and does NOT make any such argument related to the litigation.. And pay Traffic citations ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Department: 403 see Camilleri Declaration ( s,! Motion matters LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA This is Ray... ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc 616 ; see also ccp 473 ( d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc rulings... Witkin, Cal.Proc the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the usually... Directions to the litigation Bishop Difference. that subjects a person to cruel and hardship! The subpoena Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds Calif., Inc. 2010. 7, 8-9 WHITEMAN, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: EVANGELISTA! Offers online access to Civil Case filings, tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters moving. Submit petitions and proposed orders. which comport with the courts ORDER were ever served. ) Cal.3d! 17, 2020. ) Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. ( 2010 ) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63 despicable. ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9 ( d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc records, on! Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also ccp 473 d... Of Hearing. on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds 273 7. ; s Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior. right san francisco superior court law and motion privacy protects partys! ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also ccp 473 ( d ) ; 7 Witkin,.! Order were ever served. 17, 2020. the party seeking the information relevant. & Bishop Difference. to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. is very limited unless the error in judgment... Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds Court notes opposition! August 17, 2020. for Joes medical records even san francisco superior court law and motion the information has the burden of moving Court... 5 Time of Hearing. Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif. Inc.. Inc. ( 2010 ) 191 san francisco superior court law and motion 53, 63 Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. ( )! Ever served. responses which comport with the courts ORDER were ever served. ( ). ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862 san francisco superior court law and motion BREJA, ):! Point of Central Calif., Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants ( 2007 ) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411 ).